Dan Riley wrote: > there is some evidence that people presumably well versed in > IETF process and RFC2026 terminology can be sloppy in its > application--from > http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg04120.html [...] >| The IESG solicits final comments on whether the IETF community >| has consensus to publish draft-housley-tls-authz-extns as an >| _experimental standard_ given the IPR claimed. > (_emphasis_ added) Brilliant. While they were at it they also sanctioned a new "experimental track". IANA will be thrilled when I ask them to implement "experimental standard" RFC 2345 because it's on "experimental track" suited for the IDN TLD experiment. Frank -- http://www.google.com/search?cx=001904119753490578822:zvsejdqm-pw&cof=FORID:0;AH:center&q=%22experimental+track%22 _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf