Randy Presuhn wrote: [Tom Yu wrote] >> My understanding is that the Open Group / SUS standards are supposed >> to be technically and textually identical to the IEEE 1003.x >> standards, or at least, a strict superset thereof. If someone has >> evidence to the contrary, I would like to know about it. > ... > Speculating... > A strict subset might be palatable. A superset (strict or not) > probably would not, since that would entail requirements beyond > those in the intended specification. IMO an author should reference what (s)he's actually read, guessing what an "official" (but commercial) document says is risky. Frank _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf