Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Leslie asked for comments from uninvolved parties and I'm giving my
personal opinion that I would not find this work useful.  If others
do, we should go charter it.

I think it will be useful, if it succeeds in rigorously defining
metrics for upper layer protocols, given their dependencies on
the metrics for lower layer protocols. The context is how to
write meaningful service level agreements for application level
services, which require well-defined and reproducible metrics.

   Brian

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]