>>>>> "RJ" == RJ Atkinson <rja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
RJ> I support the idea that virtually any document ought to be
RJ> able to be published as an Informational RFC or Experimental
RJ> RFC. Technology that is useful will be adopted if
RJ> economically sensible, whether in an RFC or not, whether made
RJ> a formal standard or not. By having an open specification,
RJ> users can at least understand the properties of the technology
RJ> that is documented openly.
I agree with this general principle.
I continue to be unclear on how this principle interacts with IETF
consensus IANA actions, nor how it should interact.
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf