Tobias Gondrom wrote: > They just wouldn't know about an informal status as "being > approved to be released shortly". That's a feature, "approved" isn't necessarily related to "be released shortly", it can take years (or forever) to resolve all normative references to not yet approved I-Ds. > how about just shortening that period to about 45 days > instead of 60? That's what John proposed (well, he said 42 days), but it would be a huge effort to change the rules only for this minimal effect. Doing it together with something that's worthwhile like Brian's deconstruction of RFC 2026 could make sense. Frank _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf