At 05:54 PM 11/20/2007, Ted Hardie wrote:
At 11:38 PM +0000 11/20/07, Colin Perkins wrote:
>On 20 Nov 2007, at 19:07, Ted Hardie wrote:
>>At 1:59 PM +0000 11/16/07, Colin Perkins wrote:
>>>The following BoF has been proposed for the Vancouver IETF.
There is a mailing list <safe@xxxxxxxx> for discussion.
>>
>>This seems to be scheduled against both the Applications area
open meeting and a RAI group focused on media servers. Both groups
would have an interest in following this work and discussing where
future IETF work in this area will happen. Is there still a
possibility of adjusting this timing? I understand, of course,
that not every conflict can be resolved, but it would be useful to
know whether this is still something that might be addressed.
>
>We're aware of the conflicts, but this is the least bad scheduling
we've been able to find. If you have suggestions for a better slot,
we're open to ideas.
Friday morning? There are no APPs or TSV groups meeting then, and
the RAI group is
GeoPRIV, which wouldn't have as high an overlap as most other RAI groups.
But Ted, you're going to Geopriv? So how does this work?
Again, I know we can resolve every conflict, and I appreciate your
considering changes.
regards,
Ted
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf