Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





John C Klensin wrote:
    But a hotel has a special incentive to
offer us (or any other candidate for holding meetings or taking
up a lot of rooms) very low rates (measured in the differential
from their average rack rate or even their standard corporate
rate) when, for some reason or another, they expect a

John,

Actually I believe I did understand the original point. I was attempting to counter it, by pointing out that any renter, at any rate, has reasonable expectations that a facility will be usable. When a hotel makes choices that would render the facility unusuable for us, they have violated the core of the agreement, no matter the nature of the problem that renders the facility unusable.

I do not see the mere fact of any renovations as making a place unusable. However, failure to honor reservations, running jackhammers next to meeting rooms, and the like, do.

So, again, I think there is a big difference between things that alter degrees of "convenience" or, perhaps, environmental aesthetics, versus things that make the facility unusable.

I see this is a simple issue that is not very subtle. If a hotel cannot guarantee reasonable usability, then no rate is low enough.

d/

--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]