John C Klensin wrote:
You presumably could not modify or cancel that
contract based on the misbehavior of the Westin Bayshore, but
there might be grounds on the basis of the disruptions and noise
in Chicago.
Disrupted meetings and dislocated participants for two meetings.
Given that the pattern involves a single chain and given that it clearly is a
pattern, I believe you are quite right that we have a strong basis requiring a
change in any existing hotel arrangements for future meetings.
It's one thing to say that there is renovation. It is quite another to say
that the productivity of the week is affected. There is a difference between
ugly or irritating, versus disruptive. The latter can't possibly be acceptable.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf