Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bernard:

The worst case latency comes from the expert review with non-disclosure agreements.

We really do believe that this will make the latency much more consistent.

Russ


At 10:02 AM 11/6/2007, Bernard Aboba wrote:
>I also think this is an appropriate, even if significant,
>change of policy. I really don't see why we would give away
>a precious resource such as a protocol number for secret
>usage.

I also agree that the change is appropriate.  However, I am also aware of
significant frustration being voiced with respect to the speed by which
the expert review process moved -- and this change could slow it
further.  It's worth keeping in mind that the IETF has no power to prevent
people from using unallocated protocol numbers.


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]