Ran,
On 2007-11-15 02:19, RJ Atkinson wrote:
...
Further, at the recent RIPE meeting in Amsterdam, there seemed
to be very broad operator feedback in the hallways that this NAT+PT
approach is the only viable transition strategy left available to
operators at this late date.
Please can you explain this in some detail, because to me it's
just words. What services do these operators believe will work
reliably through NAT-PT and how will they handle the residual problems
of NAT-PT (which are detailed in RFC 4966)?
There's no doubt that NAT-PT will work in well-defined scenarios for
which any necessary ALGs are in place. The concern is about how it
works in the general case or for unknown future applications.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf