Eric Rescorla wrote on the general list: > it's working from the agendas that are actually submitted > for the meeting, since that's what I figure people check, > as opposed to the WG page. > Here's the SASL one > (from http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/07dec/agenda/sasl.txt). > As you can see, the drafts are listed incorrectly. Yes, copied to the SASL list, maybe it's still possible to fix the agenda before it ends up in the proceedings. Thanks, Frank _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf