Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:43:01 -0800
Joe Touch <touch@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Sam Hartman wrote:
> ...
> > Yes, Steve almost certanily did slow down any heavy CPU use during
> > the time when he was doing the backup.
> > 
> > Our point--Steve, Steve and I--is that for a lot of uses and a lot
> > of users, no one cares.
> 
> Perhaps that's why everyone is using security. We don't have a
> problem then.
> 
I didn't say that; I said that performance generally isn't the issue.
Often, there's a *perception* of a performance issue, because once
there was. The bigger problem, in my opinion, is usability.  *Lots* of
people use SSL, because they don't have to do anything.  SSL as used in
https has lots of problems I won't go into here, but it is excellent
protection against passive eavesdroppers.


		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]