Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At Sun, 25 Nov 2007 23:51:47 +0200,
Jari Arkko wrote:
> Eric is right that HBA does not appear to buy much additional value over
> CGAs. On the other hand, HBAs are very easy to support if you already
> support CGAs; and some people seem to think shared-key only crypto is
> helpful. You might disagree with that assessment, but it was the WG's
> decision. I do not personally feel a need to prevent them for including
> this support.

This seems like precisely the situation for which Experimental
was created.

-Ekr

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]