Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 11:30:42AM -0500, Thomas Narten wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> A little more background/context that got me here.
> 
> My original thinking was to do something like what ICANN and the RIRs
> have done, to bring awareness to the IPv4 situation and call for IPv6
> deployment. I think the IETF can say a bit more about why, and the
> threats to the internet architecture. (This came out of some
> conversations I had at the recent ICANN meeting).
> 
> Maybe this could be an IAB statement. Maybe an IETF statement. I'm not
> sure. But I think it would be useful to have an "IETF voice" also be
> heard in the call for deployment. Especially since there are still
> some going around saying "IPv6 is not needed." "IPv6 is still not
> done, so don't deploy yet", etc. Does the IETF think that deploying
> IPv6 is necessary and in the best interest of the Internet? If so,
> reiterating that would be good.

Clarification is important here.  By "done", do you mean the
specifications (mostly agreed), the implementations (a point of
some controversy) or the migration path (even more controversial)?

> I think though that it needs to be relatively short (which I probably
> have already blown), and high-level, since it's really aimed at higher
> level than your typical engineer. But the overal message needs to be
> "think really hard about IPv4 exhaustion and what it means to your
> business", "get serious about IPv6", and "it's done, so don't wait".

As I read the draft, a thought occurred to me that it's probably the
right level of detail for the Director of IT, Operations, or the
equivalent, but perhaps not for someone higher up in a management
chain.  Such persons may not be familiar with the CIDR terminology,
for example.

> To find a good balance between "short" and also include a bit more
> detail (especially on the implications of not seeing IPv6 deployed),
> perhaps a short executive summary (which I didn't get into -00)
> followed by a bit more detail (e.g., up to 3 pages or so) would do the
> trick.
> 
> Thomas
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
> 

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]