I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-06.txt
Reviewer: Spencer Dawkins
Review Date: 2007-11-08
IETF LC End Date: 2007-11-15
IESG Telechat date:
Summary: This document is ready for publication as a BCP, with one question
and one comment for the sponsoring AD. I should also mention that the
document is very clear and well-written.
Comments: This document uses a fair amount of SHOULD/SHOULD NOT language
without a lot of explanation about why the SHOULDs are not MUSTs. I'm not
sure what's appropriate for an APPS-area BCP, but I usually ask about
SHOULD/SHOULD NOT without guidance.
This is a BCP that recommends two different encoding escapes. If the SHOULDs
are something like "MUST unless you're using the other method", is 2119
language even needed?
Thanks,
Spencer
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf