At 04:24 AM 10/30/2007, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I admit now
s/now/not
all PSs have IPR attached, but this is almost certainly > intended to kill any IPR from achieving DS. Is that what is intended > here? I don't believe that was the intention, but that's a question for Brian. I disagree that all PSs are patented (if that is what you meant).
see above - I misspelled a word that means something else. sorry
I've implemented several such standards without worrying about patents. I believe the majority of PSs are actually published without known patents. A search in the IETF IPR tracker should answer that. /Simon
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf