Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 10:45 PM +0200 11/25/07, Jari Arkko wrote:
I'm telling this story in order to alert people to be careful.
Another option is that the RFC Editor should be more careful. It really
isn't that hard for the RFC Editor to run xml2rfc on the XML file and
wdiff it against the draft that is approved by the IESG, and bring
noticeable differences to the two parties.
This sounds to me that the submission process should ask *either* for
the TXT file or the XML file, and when the XML file was sent, use
xml2rfc to produce the TXT file.
BR, Julian
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf