Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry for the complete change in subject, but I think it's important to avoid confusion here:

On 1 dec 2007, at 12:22, Frank Ellermann wrote:

Disclaimer, I like Excel
on boxes where it's available, it's a nice product.  But it's
not nice enough to say that 1900-02-29 was day 60 in year 0,
if that's what the 6000 ooXML pages say (I only looked at some
nits in the BSI Wiki, I never read any page of the huge draft).

What are you trying to say here?

There never was a februari 29 in 1900 so giving that non-existant day a number would be problematic. From your statement, I assume there is a standard that does this, but I'm not sure which one and why. Could you enlighten us?

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]