agreed. at the risk of stating the obvious: the problem is identical
to the one where the authors submit nroff source to the rfc-editor.
it's always a good idea to run the toolchain, and then diff the text
against the I-D approved by the IESG. if there's a difference, the
relevant ADs and authors need to get on the same page.
And all of this, incidentally, is what the RFC Editor and ADs do...
ok, so the current process is adequate, we just need to be a little
more careful in following it, right?
/mtr
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf