On 11/7/07, Bernard Aboba <aboba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Here is a different take on what happened: ... There are all sorts of takes on what happened. What I was told at the time was that the CARP developers picked protocol 112 specifically to interfere with VRRP, to get back at the IETF for not accepting their anti-patent position and to show the IETF how irrelevant they were. My impression was always that the various other stories were fabricated to cover up that decision. Bill _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf