I think we need to be a little careful. Code is Law. In particular control of the conformance suite for a specification provides much greater power to influence the marketplace than mere control of the specification document. The reason much of the IETF process is the way it is today is that process was reified as tools. It needs to be clear where change control lies. > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Farrell [mailto:stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 6:27 AM > To: Jari Arkko > Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Putting requirements on volunteer tool > developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched) > > > > Jari Arkko wrote: > > > > In particular: > > > >> If I'm not mistaken, you are the developer, not the set of > end users. > >> In which case your personal preferences are not relevant. > > Their preferences are very relevant, because often they > created these > > things out of their own needs. They are very keen on > hearing what the > > users think, but please do not claim that their preferences are > > irrelevant. > > I very much agree with Jari on this. Both the old and new > daily doses have been and continue to be very useful. > > Stephen. > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf