Re: A priori IPR choices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sam Hartman wrote on the general list:

> I'd like to write in general support of re-evaluating several aspects
> of our patent policy.  I'm not quite writing in support of rechartering
> IPR at this time.  First, I think they have critical copyright work to
> finish.

+1

> Second, I think that we need to find a way to have the discussion in
> a productive forum.  I'm not entirely sure a rechartered IPR working
> group would do that.

If Simon supports it the IPR WG could adopt his draft
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-josefsson-free-standards-howto>.

Cc: to the IPR list in support of John's unscheduled process experiment
with "a DoS attack on the IETF's getting other work done."  Add smiley.
 
 Frank


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]