Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sam Hartman said:

"We move on to evaluating its work.

Now, there is a question of what happens when an SG misses its
milestones.  I could see an argument that hints at us being wrong that
we had sufficient interest.  Or perhaps an argument that the task we
set the SG was harder than anticipated."

Right.  

Since the bar for SG creation is the expectation of progress on basic 
milestones, if the SG doesn't deliver, the AD would need to 
re-evaluate the situation.  For example, if there is both an absence of 
progress as well as lack of energy (e.g. minimal mailng list 
traffic), then an extension (or even a second BOF) might be hard to 
justify. 

It is possible that the SG could deliver substandard output (e.g. review 
of the Charter and 2418 criteria garners poor reviews from the IESG/IAB 
and IETF commmunity).  In that situation, the AD needs to decide to 
give up or extend the SG. 

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]