Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



    > From: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx>

    >> Wouldn't it make more sense to put the effort into morphing v6 into
    >> something that *IS* attractive?

    > there's precious little time left to do that

Umm, Keith, we're *already* 'out' (in some sense) of IPv4 space, and have
been for a decade or more.

Why do you think there are all those blasted NAT boxes out there?

So the future just holds a *different* kind of 'running out of IPv4'
addresses, which, when it happens, the world will deal with in what seems at
the time to be the most cost-effective way of dealing with the problem, even
if it's ugly (q.v. NAT).

	Noel

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]