Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr (Aggregation of DiffServ Service Classes) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Oct 4, 2007, at 2:35 AM, Pekka Savola wrote:

On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, ken carlberg wrote:
On Oct 2, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Pekka Savola wrote:
It is not clear that consensus in the IETF and deployments is strong enough to approve/recommend any specific treatment for standards track DSCP values.

could you expand on this observation?

I don't recall when was the last (Diffserv-based) QoS talk at NANOG or similar operator-rich meeting. (Sure, there is the tutorial, but it doesn't count.)

Seems like a potential indication that most typical ISPs aren't working on or interested in this, this stuff is so trivial, or that coordination is not necessary.

Dear Pekka;

FWIW, in the video conferencing world, DiffServe QOS is ubiquitous. (This is pretty frequently over internetworks, but not generally over the Internet.) The same is true for IPTV, but of course this is not yet internetwork much. I would rate it as too simple and too deployed for NANOG.

Regards
Marshall



--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]