Re: DKIM reputation, was Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tony Finch wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Keith Moore wrote:
>   
>> It's a combination of several things - one, requiring that a domain
>> operate its own mail submission servers which sign their mail (and all
>> that that implies, like maintaining the private keys).
>>     
>
> That's just part of running a mail system.
>   
yes, but it's not inherently part of running a mail domain.  it's
unreasonable to require everyone to use mail submission servers that are
entrusted with their domain's DKIM private keys.
>> Two, many domains will be too small to develop enough of a reputation to
>> be whitelisted, and any spammer can create a temporary domain which will
>> have about as good a reputation as the vast majority of those domains.
>>     
>
> Free domain tasting is a problem that affects lots of reputation system,
> not just ones based on DKIM. If ICANN were to eliminate it lots of things
> would become easier.
>   
it's a problem even without "free domain tasting".
> Also, at the moment negative reputation is more useful (or at least easier
> to use) than positive reputation so I don't see neutral reputation as a
> bad thing (er, by definition it isn't).
>   
negative reputation of a domain is of minimal value, because spammers
will just get a new domain (or several) every time they wish to spam,
and the new domains will have neutral reputation.

>> Three, as long as people use Windows boxes, spammers will be able to
>> compromise them and hijack them to use them to originate mail on behalf
>> of their domains, thus degrading those domains' reputation.
>>     
>
> The criminals can steal infected users' online banking credentials too,
> which is far more worrying. Everyone has to keep their networks clean for
> many reasons, not just spam.
>   
nuclear war is more worrying too.  but that doesn't mean that the ease
in compromising PCs isn't a big contributor to the spam problem.  as for
"keeping...networks clean", well, of course people should try to do
that.  but as far as I can tell, so far it's more of a laudable goal
than a practical reality.

Keith


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]