On 2007-10-28 12:18, Bill Manning wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 07:52:25AM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I think the process has proved to be rather resistant to packing of
meetings, written statements distributed in the meeting room, and
back-channel campaigns to have non-participants commenting on drafts
they haven't read. None of which means we should *ignore* input from
non-participants, but we should not be ashamed of making a judgement
of its weight or lack thereof.
all of those activites indicate particpation to me.
could you please clarify "non-participant" in the
context of someone making a contribution (pro or con,
independently or in concert with others).
Contributing technical input to the discussion of a technical
proposal.
perhaps you have in mind "card-carrying" IETF members
who pay their dues and send their employees to meetings?
No.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf