Gabriel, > It occurs to me that we don't need to invent a new process here. The > IRTF houses different types of "research" groups: We don't _have_ to invent new process -- in addition to IRTF RGs, there's obviously the default option of keeping post-BOF / pre-WG efforts outside the formal IETF process until they have reached the bar for full WG approval. However, the question is what makes sense and what is the best tool for the task. We certainly could use RGs too -- and we do. RRG, HIP RG, etc. However, I think this approach is suitable for groups that have a significant research component. It seems less suitable for groups that are merely looking for a standard in the engineering space. (And I know I'm spending a lot of time with the new work proposals; I'm not sure Aaron & co would be so happy to receive new groups unless they really were about research.) Jari _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf