Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> The likes of implementers (of protocols), whether in the open-source community
> or as an employee of a vendor of hardware or software, should be given as
> much, if not more, consideration.
> 
> Ditto folks who are involved in designing/building host operating systems or
> equivalent embedded systems.

I fully agree with this.  Yet the opinions of "implementers" may not be 
easy to distinguish initially.  

For example, some of the IETF's most famous "controversies" turned out not 
to be much of a contest when looked at in retrospect -- the implementers 
ended up all on one side of the debate.  The question is whether this was 
obvious at the time, and whether we could have settled the arguments 
sooner. 

There are some current situations in the IETF, where IMHO it is quite 
obvious that a consensus of implementers exists, as judged by 
interoperable implementations.  Yet the IETF persists in taking an 
alternate path with (seemingly) little prospect of success.  Often in 
these cases the "bogo-standards" are being pushed by the WG chair(s) or 
ADs with little or no real backing from the IETF community. 

I'd suggest it would be preferrable for these efforts to "fail early" 
rather than taking years to meet their inevitable demise. 


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]