Ted Hardie <hardie@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>No. My point was that for the IETF, interoperability is the goal, not some >>general statement about goodness of Free software. In many/most/maybe all >>cases, this will require any IPR restrictions to be GPL compatible. > > Can you think of an open-source project interested in the work of > CCAMP? GNU Zebra, Quagga, and MPLS-linux are three projects that come up by searching for relevant technology. I think you are missing the point, though. The point is to make sure that a free software implementation of IETF technology is _possible_. That doesn't necessarily mean that you won't be able to find an IETF WG with technical work that may not have been implemented already in free software. /Simon _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf