RE: Spammers answering TMDA Queries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The problem is the amount of time it is taking to moderate mail sent by non subscribers.

So far the score for KEYPROV has been 98% spam. But there were a couple of messages that were very important that got trapped. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Levine [mailto:johnl@xxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 11:44 AM
> To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
> Cc: fred@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
> 
> >how many of us are now sending with DKIM or Microsoft's scheme? It 
> >might be worthwhile making ietf.org apply a policy to senders that 
> >would recognize normal participants and disallow known spam domains.
> 
> Um, spammers haven't sent mail from "known spam domains" 
> since about 2001.  These days spam has 100% forged return 
> addresses.  DKIM and Sender-ID help tell forgeries from legit 
> mail, but I haven't heard anyone say that forged mail 
> purporting to be from list participants is an issue.
> 
> Unless I am missing something, the amount of spam leaking 
> into IETF lists is currently about zero.  What problem are we 
> trying to solve?
> 
> R's,
> John
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]