John C Klensin wrote: > Assuming that this logic is reasonable (and, personally, I do), > the question remains as to why the document deserves the special > treatment of IESG sponsorship, rather than turning it over to > the tender mercies and independent review of the independent > submission process. If nothing else, handling it as an > independent submission would remove any suspicion that it was > being given special treatment because one of its authors was > IETF Chair. > > I'm not strongly advocating that approach, just asking. The IANA rules in this case require a document approved by the IESG; otherwise, independent submission would indeed be preferable. Best regards, Pasi _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf