>>>>> "Bob" == Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Bob> Tom, Bob> You're analysis of the impact on the ECN nonce is accurate. Below is Bob> our reasoning for not including the ECN nonce capability in this Bob> proposal... [...] Thanks for the detailed rationale of your decision to not include the ECN nonce. Given that the question of detecting disruption of end-to-end ECN signaling within an MPLS domain occurred to me from the mention of RFC3540 in the Security Considerations, other readers of this document may have similar questions. I suggest that you add a sentence or two to the Security Considerations summarizing your decision to exclude the ECN nonce capability from this particular proposal. However, I will not object to the passage of this document if you choose not to include such a summary. ---Tom _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf