Sam, >>>>>> "Eliot" == Eliot Lear <lear@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>>>> > > Eliot> What is the result of a "SG" hitting its mile stones? > > We move on to evaluating its work. > > Now, there is a question of what happens when an SG misses its > milestones. I could see an argument that hints at us being wrong that > we had sufficient interest. Or perhaps an argument that the task we > set the SG was harder than anticipated. > As I wrote earlier, I am not at all sure that we should even have dates associated with milestones with this kind of experiment. What is the anticipated administrative load? If we can keep it to nothingness such that an AD can simply have these things (and I still maintain that it should barely require even an AD's approval), then WHENEVER a group hits those milestones we know that it's time to pay more attention. Eliot _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf