RE: A priori IPR choices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24 Oct 2007 at 11:01 -0700, Hallam-Baker, Phillip allegedly wrote:
> What I would like to do here is to arrive at a set of terms that is
> considered to be sufficiently RANDZ

NO license required is better than RANDZ.  


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]