Fedora Development Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi
- From: Alexander Ploumistos
- Re: [HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot
- Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi
- Re: gc-7.6.4 to rawhide, *no* abi bump
- Re: [HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot
- Re: Vim: removing %{_libdir}/vim from vim-filesystem
- Re: <DKIM> Re: Dynamically-generated C stored in SVN is breaking our distribution because life is awful (was Re: F28 System Wide Change: GCC8)
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: gc-7.6.2 to rawhide, abi bump
- Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi
- Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi
- From: Alexander Ploumistos
- Re: dnf: Can't tell me what is pulling in a dependency?
- Re: F28 System Wide Change: GCC8
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- gc-7.6.2 to rawhide, abi bump
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Fedora Rawhide-20180220.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Vim: removing %{_libdir}/vim from vim-filesystem
- Vim: removing %{_libdir}/vim from vim-filesystem
- Exclude paths for elfdeps dependency generator
- Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi
- Add link to cvedetail.com in CVE bugs?
- Modularity Working Group IRC Meeting Minutes (2018-02-20)
- Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi
- From: Alexander Ploumistos
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180220.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- REMINDER: F28 Software String Freeze in one week
- Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.
- Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.
- Fedora 28 Change Checkpoint: Completion deadline (testable)
- rpm-ostree v2018.3 and ostree v2018.2
- [HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot
- Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.
- Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.
- Re: dnf: Can't tell me what is pulling in a dependency?
- Re: F28 System Wide Change: Make authselect default tool instead of authconfig
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: <DKIM> Re: Dynamically-generated C stored in SVN is breaking our distribution because life is awful (was Re: F28 System Wide Change: GCC8)
- Re: Dynamically-generated C stored in SVN is breaking our distribution because life is awful (was Re: F28 System Wide Change: GCC8)
- Re: to batch or not to batch?
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.
- new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.
- Re: <DKIM> Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Dynamically-generated C stored in SVN is breaking our distribution because life is awful (was Re: F28 System Wide Change: GCC8)
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: F28 System Wide Change: GCC8
- Fedora Rawhide-20180219.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180219.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- From: Francisco J. Tsao Santin
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity WG (once every two weeks)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: BSD 2-Clause license
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- BSD 2-Clause license
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- libgnome-games-support soname bump in rawhide
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: to batch or not to batch?
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- f2c new version
- Re: to batch or not to batch?
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Orphaned Packages looking for a new point of contact
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28
- From: David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: Intent to retire: zerofree
- Re: Removal of sln
- Re: to batch or not to batch?
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- From: Jens-Ulrik Petersen
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Intent to retire: zerofree
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Removal of sln
- Re: Removal of sln
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Intent to retire: zerofree
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Pagure - Can't remove yourself from a project if not an admin?
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Scilab, rkward install in Rawhide: nothing provides libgfortran.so.4()
- Re: Unannounced soname bump: gnome-desktop3
- Re: Unannounced soname bump: gnome-desktop3
- Fedora Rawhide-20180218.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: can't push to perl-HTML-Strip master
- Re: can't push to perl-HTML-Strip master
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- [Test-Announce] 2018-02-19 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- can't push to perl-HTML-Strip master
- Re: dnf: Can't tell me what is pulling in a dependency?
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180218.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: to batch or not to batch?
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- drpm
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Intent to retire: zerofree
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Intent to retire: zerofree
- Re: Intent to retire: zerofree
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: dnf: Can't tell me what is pulling in a dependency?
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Unannounced soname bump: gnome-desktop3
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Intent to retire: zerofree
- [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: dnf: Can't tell me what is pulling in a dependency?
- Re: Removal of sln
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Changing config from a %post?
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: GCC 8: camotics fails to build for i686, ARMv7 arches (reading 31 bytes from a region of size 16)
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: fedup upload failure
- Re: Removal of sln
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: fedup upload failure
- Re: fedup upload failure
- fedup upload failure
- Re: dnf: Can't tell me what is pulling in a dependency?
- dnf: Can't tell me what is pulling in a dependency?
- Re: to batch or not to batch?
- Re: to batch or not to batch?
- Re: Removal of sln
- Re: Koji build: cannot find spec file
- From: Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk
- Re: to batch or not to batch?
- Re: to batch or not to batch?
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- unannounced soname bump: gnome-desktop3 / libgnome-desktop-3
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180217.n.2 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Koji build: cannot find spec file
- Re: Koji build: cannot find spec file
- Re: Koji build: cannot find spec file
- Fedora Rawhide-20180217.n.2 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Koji build: cannot find spec file
- Koji build: cannot find spec file
- Re: to batch or not to batch?
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: F29 Self Contained Change: FedoraScientific VagrantBox
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- to batch or not to batch?
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: F29 Self Contained Change: FedoraScientific VagrantBox
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of sln
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Elasticsearch dependency tree trim?
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: RFC: BugURL in packages
- Re: RFC: BugURL in packages
- Pagure - Can't remove yourself from a project if not an admin?
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: <DKIM> Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: Scilab, rkward install in Rawhide: nothing provides libgfortran.so.4()
- Scilab, rkward install in Rawhide: nothing provides libgfortran.so.4()
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- F29 Self Contained Change: FedoraScientific VagrantBox
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: RFC: BugURL in packages
- Re: RFC: BugURL in packages
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: RFC: BugURL in packages
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Removal of sln
- Re: Orphaned Packages looking for a new point of contact
- Re: RFC: BugURL in packages
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Orphaned Packages looking for a new point of contact
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: RFC: BugURL in packages
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Orphaned Packages looking for a new point of contact
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2018-02-16)
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: fedpkg request-repo always fails - Could not execute request_repo
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: Changing config from a %post?
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2018-02-16)
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Changing config from a %post?
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: F28 Self Contained Change: VA-API 1.0.0
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: F29 Self Contained Change: No more automagic Python bytecompilation
- Re: RPM Lint Errors
- Re: Call for users of darkserver
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- libmodulemd: SOname bump coming to released Fedora
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: F28 Self Contained Change: VA-API 1.0.0
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: F29 Self Contained Change: No more automagic Python bytecompilation
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- F29 Self Contained Change: Drop Legacy GTK+ GUI in wireshark
- F29 Self Contained Change: True Noarch Erlang Packages
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- F29 Self Contained Change: No more automagic Python bytecompilation
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- F29 System Wide Change: Enable dbus-broker
- F29 Self Contained Change: BINUTILS 2.30
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- fedpkg request-repo always fails - Could not execute request_repo
- Re: Call for users of darkserver
- Re: Call for users of darkserver
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Self-introduction: Kaushal
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Orphaning scram
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code
- Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2018-02-16)
- Re: RANT: Packaging is changing too fast and is not well documented
- Re: Fedora27: NFS v4 terrible write performance, is async working
- Re: Fedora27: NFS v4 terrible write performance, is async working
- Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Lubomir Rintel (lkundrak)
- Re: libevent-2.1.8 SONAME change.
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2018-02-15 17:00 UTC)
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Self-introduction: Kaushal
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Usefulness of `copr mock-config <PROJECT> <CHROOT>` feature?
- Re: GCC 8: camotics fails to build for i686, ARMv7 arches (reading 31 bytes from a region of size 16)
- Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code
- Re: libevent-2.1.8 SONAME change.
- libevent-2.1.8 SONAME change.
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: RFC: BugURL in packages
- Re: RFC: BugURL in packages
- Re: RFC: BugURL in packages
- Re: Pull requests for compat-gcc-34
- Re: RFC: BugURL in packages
- Unannounced soname bump in libevent
- Re: RFC: BugURL in packages
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- RFC: BugURL in packages
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Granularity in disable mangling shebangs
- Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- GCC 8: camotics fails to build for i686, ARMv7 arches (reading 31 bytes from a region of size 16)
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Fwd: Re: Fedora27: NFS v4 terrible write performance, is async working
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Non-responsive maintainer: Lubomir Rintel (lkundrak)
- Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2018-02-16)
- Re: Release notes vs. Changelogs
- Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection
- Re: HEADS UP: yaml-cpp 0.6.0 coming to rawhide
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: Call for users of darkserver
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code
- Re: Call for users of darkserver
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Call for users of darkserver
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: HEADS UP: yaml-cpp 0.6.0 coming to rawhide
- Re: RANT: Packaging is changing too fast and is not well documented
- Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- [Guidelines change] Changes to the packaging guidelines
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: [HEADS UP] Package wireshark-gtk going away
- Re: [HEADS UP] Package wireshark-gtk going away
- Re: [HEADS UP] Package wireshark-gtk going away
- [HEADS UP] Package wireshark-gtk going away
- Release notes vs. Changelogs [was Re: Escaping macros in %changelog]
- Re: inject rpm dependency depending on library symbol?
- Re: Call for users of darkserver
- Re: CheckRequire: in spec?
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- RPM Lint Errors
- Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28
- Re: CheckRequire: in spec?
- Re: vdr-live build fails for rawhide
- Re: vdr-live build fails for rawhide
- Re: Call for users of darkserver
- Call for users of darkserver
- Re: vdr-live build fails for rawhide
- Re: Usefulness of `copr mock-config <PROJECT> <CHROOT>` feature?
- rubygem-file-tail license change
- Re: Usefulness of `copr mock-config <PROJECT> <CHROOT>` feature?
- Re: Usefulness of `copr mock-config <PROJECT> <CHROOT>` feature?
- Re: Usefulness of `copr mock-config <PROJECT> <CHROOT>` feature?
- Re: Usefulness of `copr mock-config <PROJECT> <CHROOT>` feature?
- Re: CheckRequire: in spec?
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: CheckRequire: in spec?
- CheckRequire: in spec?
- Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28
- vdr-live build fails for rawhide
- Re: Orphaning scram
- Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28
- Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection (was: Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28)
- Orphaning scram
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28
- Re: Usefulness of `copr mock-config <PROJECT> <CHROOT>` feature?
- Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28
- Re: Usefulness of `copr mock-config <PROJECT> <CHROOT>` feature?
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Gating test in bodhi failing on dependency check, can't tell why
- Re: Python2 stub packages now in EPEL stable
- Re: Python2 stub packages now in EPEL stable
- Qt 5.10.1 coming to rawhide
- Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28
- Re: "Bodhi is unable to request this update for stabilization: invalid syntax (ssl.py, line 7)"
- Re: Fedora27: NFS v4 terrible write performance, is async working
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Python2 stub packages now in EPEL stable
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28
- Re: HEADS UP: upcoming giflib-5.1.4 update in rawhide
- Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28
- Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection
- Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Usefulness of `copr mock-config <PROJECT> <CHROOT>` feature?
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection
- Re: Usefulness of `copr mock-config <PROJECT> <CHROOT>` feature?
- Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection
- Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection (was: Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28)
- clang -mcet -fcf-protection (was: Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28)
- Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28
- Re: "Bodhi is unable to request this update for stabilization: invalid syntax (ssl.py, line 7)"
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: "Bodhi is unable to request this update for stabilization: invalid syntax (ssl.py, line 7)"
- "Bodhi is unable to request this update for stabilization: invalid syntax (ssl.py, line 7)"
- Re: Give us a feedback on API situation
- Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28
- Re: F28 System Wide Change: Replace glibc's libcrypt with libxcrypt
- Re: Fedora27: NFS v4 terrible write performance, is async working
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28
- Re: OpenImageIO GCC 8 build problem?
- [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours
- [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours
- Re: Fedora27: NFS v4 terrible write performance, is async working
- Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28
- Re: Fedora27: NFS v4 terrible write performance, is async working
- Re: Fedora27: NFS v4 terrible write performance, is async working
- Re: RANT: Packaging is changing too fast and is not well documented
- Re: RANT: Packaging is changing too fast and is not well documented
- Re: Fedora27: NFS v4 terrible write performance, is async working
- Re: Fedora27: NFS v4 terrible write performance, is async working
- Re: Fedora27: NFS v4 terrible write performance, is async working
- Re: Fedora27: NFS v4 terrible write performance, is async working
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: KDE print dialog does not see CUPS settings
- Re: mock slow to get new packages for Rawhide?
- Re: mock slow to get new packages for Rawhide?
- Un-retiring tcl-thread package
- Re: mock slow to get new packages for Rawhide?
- mock slow to get new packages for Rawhide?
- Re: OpenImageIO GCC 8 build problem?
- Re: orphaned vim-vimoutliner
- Re: Please review use /$ in %files (Was: Re: Escaping macros in %changelog)
- Re: Please review use /$ in %files (Was: Re: Escaping macros in %changelog)
- Re: Build python-jsonpatch-1.21-1.fc28 not in rawhide repo
- Re: Was APLM accidently enabled in Fedora 27?
- Build python-jsonpatch-1.21-1.fc28 not in rawhide repo
- From: Alfredo Moralejo Alonso
- Re: Fedora27: NFS v4 terrible write performance, is async working
- orphaned vim-vimoutliner
- Re: Clean up your spec files
- Re: KDE print dialog does not see CUPS settings
- Re: KDE print dialog does not see CUPS settings
- Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging
- HEADS UP: yaml-cpp 0.6.0 coming to rawhide
- Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging
- Re: RANT: Packaging is changing too fast and is not well documented
- Re: OpenImageIO GCC 8 build problem?
- Re: Clean up your spec files
- Re: Non-responsive maintainer: joost
- Re: RANT: Packaging is changing too fast and is not well documented
- Re: Clean up your spec files
- Re: Clean up your spec files
- HEADS UP: upcoming giflib-5.1.4 update in rawhide
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: -Werror (or any alternatives in different languages)
- Re: -Werror (or any alternatives in different languages)
- Re: OpenImageIO GCC 8 build problem?
- Re: OpenImageIO GCC 8 build problem?
- Re: OpenImageIO GCC 8 build problem?
- Re: OpenImageIO GCC 8 build problem?
- Re: RANT: Packaging is changing too fast and is not well documented
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: RANT: Packaging is changing too fast and is not well documented
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: RANT: Packaging is changing too fast and is not well documented
- Re: OpenImageIO GCC 8 build problem?
- Re: OpenImageIO GCC 8 build problem?
- RANT: Packaging is changing too fast and is not well documented
- Re: vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.128 compiles fine on f26 but not on higher fedora version
- OpenImageIO GCC 8 build problem?
- Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Atomic, Cloud and Docker images for s390x
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- -Werror (or any alternatives in different languages)
- Re: Rawhide armv7hl buildroot busted?
- Re: Atomic Host/Workstation Interview for Linux Unplugged Podcast
- Re: Rawhide armv7hl buildroot busted?
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- [Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-02-12 Fedora QA Meeting
- [Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-02-12 blocker review meeting
- Re: Rawhide armv7hl buildroot busted?
- Re: inject rpm dependency depending on library symbol?
- Package review - test builds for OpenVPN 3 Client
- Re: Rawhide armv7hl buildroot busted?
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: inject rpm dependency depending on library symbol?
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Atomic Host/Workstation Interview for Linux Unplugged Podcast
- Rawhide armv7hl buildroot busted?
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Outage: Switch Outage - 2018-02-11 15:00 UTC
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.128 compiles fine on f26 but not on higher fedora version
- Re: inject rpm dependency depending on library symbol?
- Re: inject rpm dependency depending on library symbol?
- inject rpm dependency depending on library symbol?
- Was APLM accidently enabled in Fedora 27?
- vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.128 compiles fine on f26 but not on higher fedora version
- Re: Pull requests for compat-gcc-34
- Re: Pull requests for compat-gcc-34
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Pull requests for compat-gcc-34
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- unresponsive maintainer 'jamatos'
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: [HEADS UP] Mass-macro-escape in %changelog
- Re: Clean up your spec files
- Re: [HEADS UP] Mass-macro-escape in %changelog
- Re: Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainers - xing, noriko, aortega, jcholast, mzatko
- Re: Pull requests for compat-gcc-34
- Re: Pull requests for compat-gcc-34
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Fedora27: NFS v4 terrible write performance, is async working
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- [HEADS UP] Mass-macro-escape in %changelog (was: Escaping macros in %changelog)
- Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Atomic, Cloud and Docker images for s390x
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: F28 Self Contained Change: VA-API 1.0.0
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: [HEADS UP] poppler-qt4 going away
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Pull requests for compat-gcc-34
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Fwd: Re: Fedora27: NFS v4 terrible write performance, is async working
- Re: glibc, riscv64, multilib, /lib64 etc
- Re: Fwd: Re: Fedora27: NFS v4 terrible write performance, is async working
- Re: glibc, riscv64, multilib, /lib64 etc
- Re: glibc, riscv64, multilib, /lib64 etc
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Please review use /$ in %files (Was: Re: Escaping macros in %changelog)
- Re: Please review use /$ in %files (Was: Re: Escaping macros in %changelog)
- Re: Please review use /$ in %files (Was: Re: Escaping macros in %changelog)
- Re: Please review use /$ in %files (Was: Re: Escaping macros in %changelog)
- Re: Please review use /$ in %files (Was: Re: Escaping macros in %changelog)
- Please review use /$ in %files (Was: Re: Escaping macros in %changelog)
- Re: Clean up your spec files
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Clean up your spec files
- Re: Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Clean up your spec files
- Re: Clean up your spec files
- Re: Clean up your spec files
- Escaping macros in %changelog
- Re: Clean up your spec files
- Re: Clean up your spec files
- Re: Clean up your spec files
- Request to unretire Compton
- From: Abhiram Kuchibhotla
- Re: Clean up your spec files
- Re: glibc, riscv64, multilib, /lib64 etc
- Re: Clean up your spec files
- [HEADS UP] poppler-qt4 going away
- Re: cmake, mc unresponsive packagers
- Re: Clean up your spec files
- Re: Clean up your spec files
- Re: glibc, riscv64, multilib, /lib64 etc
- Re: glibc, riscv64, multilib, /lib64 etc
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]