On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 3:50 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 03:02:47PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Correct, this is about ensuring that all Fedora installations have
> > access to the modules we build, but there's no change to how
> > they're stored on mirrors, etc.
> Ok. Do we ever foresee the hybrid repository approach happening in Fedora?
The hybrid approach is "things can be built as modules, but tagged into
the base", right? What problems does this solve vs. allowing modules to
be used as dependencies and build deps?
I think the "hybrid approach" he's referring to is having modular and non-modular RPMs living in the same directory structure. I don't see that being needed in Fedora at this point.
If he *does* mean the above, I think that's going to be solved by Ursa Major (long explanation available on request), but that's probably an F30+ feature. And yeah, that will basically be allowing modules to be a dep for non-modular content.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/MDYU7HZLVD6GUDKZKIE7Z4PNKXXEZD6K/
