On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 08:55:16 -0500 Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > >> If there's continued silence and i686 kernel doesn't get fixed > >> soon, I'll file ticket with FESCO asking for i686 arch to be > >> removed from main koji and relegated to a secondary koji instance, > >> so i686 doesn't block maintainers going forward... > > > > Not sure it's as simply as that. Doing as you suggest means > > multilib support is lost too. > > > > Right, the proper solution would be officially dropping the i686 > kernel, and leaving just the headers package. That would mean that > packages which also depend on the actual kernel itself would be > modified to drop i686 builds. In such a case, if the SIG were to > decide to continue trying for an i686 release, those packages > themselves would need to be built on a secondary koji, though they > could still use the packages that are build in primary for multilib. we handled 32-bit s390 multilib under s390x similarly, no kernel, but all userspace was built Dan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/X35UBTEVCTA3SUH4LAHT3ZU3ZKWD2QDA/
