On Mo, 18.06.18 16:50, Ondřej Lysoněk (olysonek@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Hi, > > On 18.6.2018 15:27, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Do, 14.06.18 14:20, Chris Murphy (lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > >> The cited BLS spec is the original one, not the more thoroughly > >> discussed and thought through variant by Matthew Garrett [1] some > >> years ago. > > > > Quite frankly, as one of the authors of the original BLS spec, I can'd > > say Matthew's version was much discussed with me... > > > > I mean, I am open to extending the spec, but we should do this bit by > > bit. > > > > Zbigniew suggested to move the spec into docbook or markdown format, > > and then accept changes via usual github PRs. If there's interest > > still in extending the spec with some of Matthew's ideas we can > > certainly look into that, but in general I'd actually prefer to reduce > > the size of the spec if possible, and drop as many bits of it as we > > can, i.e. the stuff noone implements anyway. > > It would be great if we could extend the spec with optional support for > multiple initrd images (the Tuned daemon depends on that). Fedora's > GRUB2 already supports multiple initrd images (it allows specifying > multiple lines with the "initrd" key), but I'd like to make sure that > whoever implements BLS in the future and decides to support multiple > initrds will not choose a different syntax for it. Would you be open to > extending the spec with that? Sure, allowing multiple initrd keys in the snippets makes a ton of sense. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/KKC7KFBNLSZQLA3756ECZEFJPIC2UO6W/
