Hi, On 18.6.2018 15:27, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Do, 14.06.18 14:20, Chris Murphy (lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > >> The cited BLS spec is the original one, not the more thoroughly >> discussed and thought through variant by Matthew Garrett [1] some >> years ago. > > Quite frankly, as one of the authors of the original BLS spec, I can'd > say Matthew's version was much discussed with me... > > I mean, I am open to extending the spec, but we should do this bit by > bit. > > Zbigniew suggested to move the spec into docbook or markdown format, > and then accept changes via usual github PRs. If there's interest > still in extending the spec with some of Matthew's ideas we can > certainly look into that, but in general I'd actually prefer to reduce > the size of the spec if possible, and drop as many bits of it as we > can, i.e. the stuff noone implements anyway. It would be great if we could extend the spec with optional support for multiple initrd images (the Tuned daemon depends on that). Fedora's GRUB2 already supports multiple initrd images (it allows specifying multiple lines with the "initrd" key), but I'd like to make sure that whoever implements BLS in the future and decides to support multiple initrds will not choose a different syntax for it. Would you be open to extending the spec with that? Thanks. Best regards Ondřej Lysoněk _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/UPTBATX3EUGUJFEDQS4DDHB7GSVI5BA5/
