On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:19 AM Jan Pazdziora <jpazdziora@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 10:35:34AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote: > > = Proposed System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64 = > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/i686_Is_For_x86-64 > > > > > > Owner(s): > > * Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> > > > > > > Fedora builds its i686 packages for use on x86-64 systems as multi-lib RPMs. > > > > > > > > == Detailed description == > > Currently, the i686 RPM packages are built in such a way that they are > > compatible with very old i686 systems, such as the Pentium III. The > > only addition over the i686/Pentium Pro baseline is a requirement to > > support long NOPs, for Intel CET. However, the majority of > > installations of i686 packages is for use on x86_64 systems, as > > multi-lib RPMs. Furthermore, there are reports that the i686 kernel > > does not run stable on old hardware which is not x86-64-capable ( > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/ZHV6I4IEO7GRYAZ4TUMO5VH2ZHLCNJZQ/ > > ). > > This proposal suggests to accept this reality and build the i686 > > packages in such a way that they require the ISA level of (early) > > x86-64 CPUs. > > > > > > == Scope == > > * Proposal owners: > > Adjust the redhat-rpm-config, gcc, and glibc packages to switch to the > > new compiler flags. Except for mstackrealign, there is substantial > > experience with this configuration downstream. > > > > * Other developers: > > Other developers can enable SSE2 optimization in their packages if > > they want, where this has been a compile-time option only. > > > > * Release engineering: > > https://pagure.io/releng/issues/7543 #7543 > > > > ** List of deliverables: TBD > > > > * Policies and guidelines: > > i686 is no longer a primary architecture. The Packaging Guidelines do > > not currently require support for non-SSE2 x86 systems, so no change > > is required there. > > Could the title and nature of this proposed change be modified to > > Dropping support for non-SSE2 x86 systems > > rather than removing i686 from primary architectures and implying that > we no longer do i686-only distribution? Reading this thread, the > SSE2/non-SSE2 distinction is where the change is aiming anyway, isn't > it? i686 is already no longer a primary architecture. We do not block releases on i686-only issues, which is the only distinction "primary" has these days. josh _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/2DIXN64HYE23JHNV3IICMEIBIBBTZJVN/
