On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mi, 20.06.18 13:15, Stephen Gallagher (sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> The proper behavior here would be for these services not to be marked as
> "failed" when the appropriate hardware is not present. When possible, we
> should be using systemd's Condition* features to skip attempting to start
> it at all, …
Just to mention this: triggered by this mail I posted this PR:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/9360
This adds ConditionSecurity=uefi-secureboot, which could be nice and
accurate way to condition out that secureboot service.
That said, it'll probably be a while before that propagates into
fedora.
Lennart
Thanks...
For mcelog and rngd if you don't want to rely on the fact the the cpu is AMD:
mcelog has an option --is-cpu-supported
and
rngd has an option --list
Either way, it's absolutely doable. No reason to burden users with misleading, unneeded
error messages.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/XMHZLZVLNJXZGTMOLELD6AZ2ZVIJHUBH/
