On Mi, 20.06.18 13:15, Stephen Gallagher (sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > The proper behavior here would be for these services not to be marked as > "failed" when the appropriate hardware is not present. When possible, we > should be using systemd's Condition* features to skip attempting to start > it at all, … Just to mention this: triggered by this mail I posted this PR: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/9360 This adds ConditionSecurity=uefi-secureboot, which could be nice and accurate way to condition out that secureboot service. That said, it'll probably be a while before that propagates into fedora. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/FEMQIUE3P7ETC4L2RWJSVS2IHMOM5WP2/
