On Mi, 20.06.18 19:40, Chris Murphy (lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > What's going on? What is this? Why is this called "Boot loader spec" > > if it implements an entirely different logic, and misses the entire > > point of the boot loader spec? > > > > Quite frankly, I am really surprised by this and this makes me wonder > > what the whole point of this feature is at all, and very sure we > > shouldn't have it like this. > > I agree. > > But I also think there is some incremental risk of namespace collision > with /loader/entries as mentioned in Matthew Garrett's derivative of > the spec, if it's not located in /EFI/fedora/ > > Could $BOOT/org/freedesktop/bls/entries instead be > $BOOT/org.freedesktop.bls/entries ? The boot loader spec is already implemented in various tools under the very "$BOOT/loader/entries" name (just read it aloud, it tells you exactly what this is), I doubt there's need to rename it now. it's not that the namespace below $BOOT or ESP is particularly crowded, anyway. Also, I like my bikesheds blue. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/2MTPVW265CZ6O4OUETABRLQE4OQOZDN6/
