On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 03:57:36PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 3:53 PM Randy Barlow > > Downside is that it would be possible (though I'd guess unlikely) for > > all of FESCo to suddenly change to 9 different people and there'd be no > > members who know the current state of things. We would also need to do > > something a little awkward to get into this state since we currently > > have staggered terms. > > The election structure was setup specifically to avoid this problem. > The alternative solutions were all pretty poor. This seems to be a very theoretical problem because it would mean that we have nine times the number of new candidates that we have now and everyone is so unsatisfied with FESCo that only new candidates will be elected. And if there is so deep dissatisfaction, a fresh start might even be a good idea. Also there would still be other people around to provide guidance or there is another problem. Kind regards Till _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/PPMQFWAZ3MXR3FA3QUNWJOTAQRAEVRAO/
