Re: equivalent of Debian config-package?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> I guess we disagree about what the problem is, but it's unfortunate if
>> Fedora/RH isn't interested in the sort of environment for which
>> config-package was developed.
>
> Can you elaborate more on what that environment is?

A fairly large university (not as big as MIT) with on-campus and
off-campus systems, already installed or not, and centrally-managed or
not..

> I read the
> website you linked to, but I still don't understand how this wouldn't
> be similarly solved with Ansible.

Doubtless it could be done with Ansible, but than you have to bootstrap
and maintain Ansible as well as the rest of it, and worry about a
competing Ansible on some centrally-managed systems.

[If I was managing a bunch of centrally-managed on-campus systems like
teaching "clusters", I'd just use a stateless image, as for an HPC
cluster, and as used to work on such systems with ~zero resources other
than AFS knowledge.]
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/3LBAZWXDE2W4MFDK43BQL2IMKOAOMN2R/




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux