On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 2:29 PM Dave Love <loveshack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > You wrote: > > > I think generally the Fedora/RH-ecosystem answer is to use Ansible for > > configuration, rather than configuration packages. > > > > That's not sayin' there can't be another answer, but in general that's > > the route *I'd* take to solve this problem on my systems. > > I guess we disagree about what the problem is, but it's unfortunate if > Fedora/RH isn't interested in the sort of environment for which > config-package was developed. Can you elaborate more on what that environment is? I read the website you linked to, but I still don't understand how this wouldn't be similarly solved with Ansible. josh _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/L3B3VQSD5GL3PPQG67G3VR2EHQ3IX5UO/
