On 20/06/18 15:17, Jerry James wrote:
There was a successful clisp build for f28, which depends on gdbm rather than compat-gdbm, so I don't know why the F26 build should matter. Clisp is again failing to build in Rawhide, though. I've got it on my list of Fedora Things To Do. I will try updating to a more recent version soon and see if that fixes the build failure. (Fingers crossed; clisp is a very finicky package.)
I guess because 2.49-22.20170224hg.fc26 is the version currently in rawhide, which is indeed older than the version in F28 which suggests that it wasn't built in rawhide first as is supposed to happen. As you say it looks like the new version was built simultaneously in f28 and rawhide and the rawhide build failed and was never fixed so it still has the f26 one. Tom -- Tom Hughes (tom@xxxxxxxxxx) http://compton.nu/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/2XGNSXO5QEJSSXXKQVXY4QC5AEQB63WL/
