Re: gdbm reabase question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 3:50 AM <mskalick@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> clisp-0:2.49-22.20170224hg.fc26.i686
> clisp-0:2.49-22.20170224hg.fc26.x86_64

There was a successful clisp build for f28, which depends on gdbm
rather than compat-gdbm, so I don't know why the F26 build should
matter.  Clisp is again failing to build in Rawhide, though.  I've got
it on my list of Fedora Things To Do.  I will try updating to a more
recent version soon and see if that fixes the build failure.  (Fingers
crossed; clisp is a very finicky package.)
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/M6R3KZ5F2KCVNOCIE4A5PUTNJKA6NXWE/




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux