Re: gdbm reabase question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 8:27 AM Tom Hughes <tom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I guess because 2.49-22.20170224hg.fc26 is the version currently
> in rawhide, which is indeed older than the version in F28 which
> suggests that it wasn't built in rawhide first as is supposed
> to happen.
>
> As you say it looks like the new version was built simultaneously
> in f28 and rawhide and the rawhide build failed and was never fixed
> so it still has the f26 one.

I was able to get a successful clisp build in Rawhide after updating
to the latest upstream sources, so it is now built against the current
gdbm.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/6A6HFMSEMXCA7DRDOWWNGO5JGDUSZTNU/




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux